MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

State of the Art in Off-Line Signature Verification

2008· book-chapter· en· W2475693720 on OpenAlexaff
Luana Batista, Dominique Rivard, Robert Sabourin, Éric Granger, Patrick Maupin

Bibliographic record

VenueIGI Global eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignature (topology)Computer scienceBiometricsField (mathematics)Face (sociological concept)State (computer science)Data miningFeature extractionFeature (linguistics)Digital signatureLine (geometry)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer securityAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic signature verification is a biometric method that can be applied in all situations where handwritten signatures are used, such as cashing a check, signing a credit card, authenticating a document, and others. Over the last two decades, several innovative approaches for off-line signature verification have been introduced in literature. Therefore, this chapter presents a survey of the most important techniques used for feature extraction and verification in this field. The chapter also presents strategies used to face the problem of a limited amount of data, as well as important challenges and research directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIGI Global eBooksSame topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207