MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2475720898 · doi:10.1002/9781119121725.ch7

Epidemiology and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes

2015· other· en· W2475720898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sathish Parthasarathy, Pratik Choudhary

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)MedicineDiabetes mellitusGlutamate decarboxylaseType 1 diabetesEpidemiologyPathogenesisDiseaseImmunologyAntibodyType 2 diabetesInternal medicinePediatricsEndocrinologyBiologyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Type 1 diabetes is caused by autoimmune destruction of islet β-cells leading to a complete deficiency of insulin. The incidence of type 1 diabetes increases with age, the highest incidence being observed in 10-14 year olds. China and South America have a low incidence (<1/100 000) with the highest incidence (>20/100 000) in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Portugal, United Kingdom (UK) and Canada and New Zealand. Most patients (>70%) are glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) +ve, but there are subgroups of patients who only have antibodies against one of the other antigens. Greater titres and number of antibodies are associated with earlier onset of disease. The insidious type 1 diabetes process usually starts a number of years before clinical presentation, with studies showing most patients have evidence of abnormal glucose tolerance a few years before.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiabetes and associated disorders→French-language works237,207→