MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2475803343 · doi:10.1057/9780230371668_3

Agonistic Politics, 1871–1874

2008· book-chapter· en· W2475803343 on OpenAlexaff
F. K. Cameron, Don Dombowsky

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2008
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Canadian institutionsBishop's UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFatherlandConstitutionAnnexationVictoryPoliticsLawPolitical scienceEnthusiasmPower (physics)HistoryDanishAncient historyPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In November 1863, during Nietzsche’s final year at Pforta, the Danish Rigsraad (Federal Council) passed a new constitution which incorporated the duchy of Schleswig into the Danish kingdom, but in the process violated the Treaty and Protocol of London (1852). Instead of striving to defuse this international crisis, Bismarck was eager to exercise his military power in order to satisfy his main objective: the annexation of Schleswig and Holstein. When Denmark refused to rescind the new constitution, the Austro-Prussian army invaded Schleswig in January 1864. In March 1864, Nietzsche had registered for the military, and was notified that his one-year service would commence no later than October 1, 1867. News of the decisive military victory over the Danes on April 18, with the seizure of the Düppel fortifications, was greeted with much enthusiasm in Prussia and was cause for celebration at Pforta. The war concluded without Nietzsche’s participation, but he was particularly impressed by ‘the fatherland’s army for its glorious deeds’. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks→Same topicNietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel→French-language works237,207→