MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2475854981

Understanding electric industrial ecosystems through exergy

2011· article· en· W2475854981 on OpenAlexaff
Cornelia Aida Bulucea, Doru A. Nicola, Nikos E. Mastorakis, Marc A. Rosen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Energy & Environment · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Industrial Ecology
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExergyIndustrial ecologyFocus (optics)EcosystemComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental scienceSystems engineeringEcologyEngineeringProcess engineeringSustainability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this study is to enhance the way of thinking that human activities cannot be separated from the functioning of the entire system on Earth. Learning from Nature means to accept that the technical systems and processes involving energy conversion and matter transformation need to be linked to environment engineering. This paper adopts a dualist view, incorporating technical and environmental dimensions, to describe the applicability of exergy to electrical ecosystems, since industrial ecology permits an alternate view of human applications, related both to technical and environmental reference systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.036 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Conference on Energy & EnvironmentSame topicSustainable Industrial EcologyFrench-language works237,207