The Effects Of Ni <sub>3</sub> Al Binder Content on The Electrochemical Response of Tic‐ni <sub>3</sub> Al Cermets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TiC-based cermet samples were successfully fabricated with varying amounts of nickel aluminide (alloy IC-50) metal binder, ranging from 10 to 40 vol. %, through a simple melt 0infiltration process. Each of the fabricated compositions was then assessed to determine its degree of resistance to corrosion in an aqueous environment (with 3.5 wt. % NaCl addition), using a variety of electrochemical testing methods. The preliminary results indicate that samples with the lowest binder contents exhibit a greater potential to resist corrosion. However, it is also conjectured that the higher metal binder content samples (i.e. 30 and 40 vol. %) display fewer areas of breakdown and passivation/repassivation after corrosion testing, and hence an overall greater resistance to corrosive attack in terms of the overall extent of sample degradation. The influence of corrosion attack on the microstructure/composition of these materials will be discussed, through the use of electron microscopy and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".