Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radar, widespread systems, and threat forecasting 8.1.1 Time to re flect Because radar has revolutionized the way convective storms can be monitored, it is primarily thought of as an instrument to be used for observing smaller, more rapidly evolving systems (Fig. 8.1). An undesirable consequence of this mental association between convective weather and radar is that when larger, or slowly evolving widespread systems are on the forecast menu, we often stop looking at the radar data and primarily rely on other sources of information. Admittedly, there are at least two good reasons for downplaying the role of radar in widespread systems: (1) there are many additional tools to analyze widespread systems, from satellite imagery to surface and upper-air measurements, in addition to model-based prognosis; and (2) individual radar coverage is small compared with most widespread systems (e.g., Figs. 1.4 and 8.1), making it inappropriate for a complete assessment of the weather situation. However, since widespread systems can also be disruptive, any instrument that can help assess the possible weather threats should be used. Moreover, radars being networked, it is now possible to get radar information over wider scales and to easily access data from radars outside of one's forecast region. Finally, forecasters have a luxury that they do not have when forecasting convective systems: time. Instead of just reacting to a fast-evolving situation, they can afford to reflect a few minutes and consider the more subtle yet rich information provided by radar under these circumstances. As a result, this extra time can allow us to do more than just warn for an existing threat. Radar is most useful in widespread systems when it provides information that shows important discrepancies between what is expected to be observed given the current forecast and what is actually happening, and then provides additional clues on how to modify the forecast. Radar hence becomes less of a primary detection tool as it was in convection, but instead assumes a key role to help adjust forecasts, particularly in the 0- to 12-h time frame.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".