Abstract CT097: A first-in-human phase I dose escalation study of the OX40 agonist MOXR0916 in patients with refractory solid tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: OX40 is a co-stimulatory receptor that is transiently expressed by T cells upon antigen recognition. In murine models, OX40 engagement by an agonist anti-OX40 antibody can promote durable tumor regression associated with co-stimulation of effector T cells and reduction of regulatory T cells. MOXR0916 is a humanized effector-competent agonist IgG1 monoclonal antibody that targets OX40. Methods: A Phase I, open-label, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of MOXR0916 in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors that have progressed after available standard therapy. MOXR0916 was administered at fixed doses every 3 weeks (q3w), and treatment beyond RECIST progression was permitted in the absence of clinical deterioration. A 3+3 dose-escalation was conducted in immunotherapy-naïve pts with a 21-day window to evaluate dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). A dedicated expansion cohort enrolled pts who consented to serial tumor biopsies, enabling immune profiling by immunohistochemistry and gene expression methods. In the biopsy cohort, prior immunotherapy with adequate washout was permitted, provided there was no history of Grade (G) ?3 immune-mediated adverse events (AEs). Results: Enrollment in the dose-finding phase of the trial is complete, with 34 pts treated across 10 dose escalation cohorts (dose levels 0.2-1200 mg) and 36 pts treated in the serial biopsy cohort (dose levels 3.2-600 mg). While NSCLC (n = 8), clear cell RCC (n = 6), melanoma (n = 2), and bladder (n = 2) were represented, less immunogenic tumor types predominated. The median number of prior regimens for metastatic disease was 2 (range 0-9); 4 pts had received prior checkpoint inhibitors. As of 11 Jan 2016, no DLTs, G4/5 AEs attributed to study treatment, or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were reported. The majority of treatment-related AEs were G1 in severity; 4 related G3 events (autoimmune hepatitis responsive to steroids, worsening dyspnea in a pt with malignant pleural effusions, hypertension, and fatigue) were reported. At doses ?40 mg q3w, PK was linear and sustained peripheral blood OX40 receptor saturation was achieved. Tumor pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker modulation supportive of the mechanism of action was observed in a subset of pts. Eleven of 70 pts (16%) have been treated with MOXR0916 for > 6 months (?9 cycles) with a best response of stable disease per RECIST v1.1. Updated clinical data will be presented. Conclusions: In a heterogeneous, refractory population, MOXR0916 was well-tolerated at all doses evaluated. The recommended dose and schedule based on PK and OX40 receptor saturation is 300 mg q3w. Tumor PD modulation and evidence of prolonged stable disease support the ongoing expansion phase to evaluate anti-tumor activity in select indications and Phase Ib trial in combination with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1). Citation Format: Aaron R. Hansen, Jeffrey R. Infante, Grant McArthur, Michael S. Gordon, Alexander M. Lesokhin, Ann-Lee Stayner, Todd M. Bauer, Shahneen Sandhu, Frank Tsai, Alexandra Snyder, Deepa S. Subramaniam, Jeong Kim, Eric Stefanich, Chi-Chung Li, Jane Ruppel, Maria Anderson, Houston Gilbert, Bruce McCall, Mahrukh A. Huseni, Ina Rhee, Michael Pishvaian. A first-in-human phase I dose escalation study of the OX40 agonist MOXR0916 in patients with refractory solid tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT097.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".