MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2476671745 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2015.0954

NDA SNR estimation using fourth‐order cross‐moments in time‐varying single‐input multiple‐output channels

2016· article· en· W2476671745 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOrder (exchange)AlgorithmMathematicsStatisticsControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the authors propose a moment‐based estimator of the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) over time‐variant Rayleigh fading single‐input multiple‐output channels. The correlated time‐variant channel is modelled with the well‐known Jakes’ model. The authors’ approach uses the fourth‐order cross‐moments of the received signal to estimate the SNR with the presence of an additive white Gaussian noise which is uncorrelated between antenna elements. The SNR is deduced by estimating, respectively, the powers of the useful signals and the noise. The proposed SNR estimator is a non‐data‐aided (NDA) method since it does not require a training sequence. The performances of this algorithm are investigated in terms of normalised mean square error over a wide range of scenarios. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the NDA maximum‐likelihood‐based estimators and the moment‐based estimators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it