Community Cookbooks, Women and the ‘Building of the Civil Society’ in Australia, 1900–38
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cookbooks are amongst the most often-used sources for understanding various elements of food history. They also provide insight into aspects of cultural and political identity and the function of social and community groups. The community cookbook genre has its origins in the United States Civil War, and was well established in North America by the 1870s. It is quite likely the idea came to Australia with the 1891 publication, in Sydney, of a Canadian community cookbook, The Home Cookbook, compiled by the Ladies of Toronto and districts in 1874. (This, incidentally, appears to be the first instance of a community cookbook going international.) The idea took hold, and before long Australian women were producing their own recipe compilations. Colin Bannerman refers to the 1894 publication of a cookery book by the Queensland Presbyterian Women's Missionary Union (PWMU), shortly followed by the Cookery Book of Good and Tried Receipts, by the New South Wales PWMU in 1895, as the first recorded publications of community cookbooks in Australia.1 KeywordsCivil SocietyGolf ClubSunday SchoolTest RecipeHome CookeryThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".