MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2477023580 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-208-6:135

Rodent Models of Parkinson's Disease

2003· book-chapter· en· W2477023580 on OpenAlexaff
Fraçois B. Jolicoeur, Robert Rivest

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubstantia nigraLocus CeruleusDopamineNeuropathologyNeurochemicalParkinson's diseaseNeuroscienceApathyPsychologyMedicineInternal medicineDiseasePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cardinal symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are rigidity, akinesia, and tremors. Secondary symptoms include postural abnormalities and neuropsychiatric disturbances such as depression, cognitive disorders, and apparent apathy ( Barbeau, 1979 ; Schultz, 1984 ; Marsden et al., 1975 ). The basic neuropathology of Parkinson’s disease involves degeneration of the heavily pigmented cells of the substantia nigra, locus ceruleus, and other brainstem nuclei ( Hornykiewicz, 1972 ; Barbeau, 1979 ; Hornykiewicz and Kish, 1986 ). A markedly decreased concentration of dopamine (DA) and its metabolites is the main neurochemical change in the disease, although other neurotransmitters such as norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-hydroxy-tryptamine, 5-HT) are also reduced ( Hornykiewicz, 1972 ; Schultz, 1984 ; Agid and Javoy-Agid, 1985 ; Hornykiewicz and Kish, 1986 ). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207