Le rôle de la bienfaisance dans les représentations identitaires des Acadiens à partir de la déportation en Nouvelle-Angleterre (1755-2005)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette thèse porte sur la représentation d'un groupe de réfugiés de guerre: les Acadiens en 1755, date de leur déportation en Nouvelle-Angleterre, l'évolution de cette dernière et l'imprégnation continue de la bienfaisance dans cette évolution. Elle porte sur trois siècles et singularise les représentations de ces réfugiés dans plusieurs régions transatlantiques: la Nouvelle-Angleterre, le Québec, les provinces maritimes canadiennes et la France. Cette thèse s'arrête également sur l'impact social et politique de ces représentations pour la communauté acadienne actuelle. This dissertation focuses on the representation of a group of war refugees: Acadians in 1755, when they were expelled in New England. It traces the representation's evolution and the impact of humanitarianism. It deals with three centuries and singles out représentations in several transatlantic régions: New England, Québec, Eastern Canada and France. This dissertation singles out the social and political impact of humanitarianism in contemporary représentations of the Acadian community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".