MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2477285746 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.09.120

Establishing Multivariate Specification Regions for Raw Materials using SMB-PLS

2015· article· en· W2477285746 on OpenAlexaff
Kamran Azari, Julien Lauzon‐Gauthier, Jayson Tessier, Carl Duchesne

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsAlcoa (Canada)Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaw materialMultivariate statisticsProcess (computing)Process engineeringComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Raw dataQuality (philosophy)Multivariate analysisProduct (mathematics)Final productReliability engineeringMathematicsEngineeringMachine learningChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new Sequential Multi-block PLS algorithm is applied for establishing multivariate specification regions jointly on multiple types of raw materials. SMB-PLS distinguishes between process variations associated with raw materials from other orthogonal sources of variations such as operating policies. Combinations of raw material properties not compensated by the control schemes are clearly identified. Multivariate specifications are required for these combinations to avoid negative impact on process performance and product quality. The method was applied to an industrial aluminum smelter. Bad combinations of raw material properties were identified and validated against process knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicMineral Processing and GrindingFrench-language works237,207