La evaluación formativa en la asignatura “Movimientos cooperativos y agribusiness en Canadá” Master Internacional en Estudios Norteamericanos, Universidad de La Laguna
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl trabajo estudia la evolucion de cooperativismo canadiense en el marco de las ensenanzas de postgrado. La necesidad de disenar una asignatura atractiva dirigida a un auditorio que por primera vez tomaba contacto con la economia social, hizo que se extremaran las precauciones a la hora de filtrar y seleccionar los contenidos. Una primera parte esta dedicada a ubicar desde el punto de vista didactico la asignatura en el plan de estudios, asi como esbozar el contenido de los bloques tematicos. A continuacion, se exponen las herramientas didacticas y de aprendizaje que se llevan a cabo. Aqui se hace especial hincapie en el uso de recursos telematicos a la hora de desarrollar las practicas. A lo largo del bimestre se persigue como objetivo principal el hacer llegar a los alumnos el hecho diferencial que distingue a las sociedades cooperativas de las sociedades mercantiles. Se concluye que las ensenanzas universitarias basadas en explicar los procesos asociativos independientemente de la estructura que tomen, tienen a juicio de este autor, un largo y fructifero recorrido, siempre que haya un apoyo decidido por parte de las autoridades academicas. EnglishThe paper analyzes the evolution of Canadian cooperatives in the context of postgraduate teaching. The necessity to design an attractive subject addressed to an audience that took first time contact with the social economy, made to take precautions when filtering and selection of content. The first part is dedicated to locate from point of view teaching the subject in the curriculum as well as outline the contents of the thematic blocks. The following outlines the teaching and learning tools that are carried out. Here the emphasis is on using Internet resources in developing the practice. Throughout the two months is pursued as main objective to get students the differential factor that distinguishes the cooperative societies of commercial companies. It is concluded that university education based on associative processes to explain whether the structure they take, are the opinion of this author, a long and fruitful journey, wherever there is strong support by the academic authorities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it