Investigation of breathing-disordered sleep quantification using the oxygen saturation signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis investigates the feasibility of using the non-invasive biomedical signal of oxygen saturation, or SpO2 , to diagnose a sleep disorder known as Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Hypopnoea Syndrome (OSAHS). Epidemiologically, OSAHS is the most common condition investigated by sleep clinics. In a patient suspected of having the disorder, the upper airway is obstructed during sleep and a cessation in respiration results. An apnoea is defined as a temporary cessation of breathing. Similarly, a hypopnoea is defined as any reduction in breathing (i.e., less severe than an apnoea). The work has three main objectives; the first being to establish automated evaluation procedures for methods of quantifying apnoeic activity from the SpO2 signal, the second being to accurately identify apnoeic and normal activity on a minute-by-minute basis, the third being to create a Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) based on the analysis which is comparable to the gold-standard Apnoea Hypopnoea Index (AHI) derived by experts. The detection of apnoeic activity is determined using three separate analyses: time domain, frequency domain, and autoregressive modelling with an incorporated amplitude criterion. A training dataset is utilised for algorithm development, and an independent dataset is employed for testing . All three methods result in comparable overall classification accuracies of: 81.2% (time domain), 82.1% (frequency domain), and 80.0% (autoregressive modelling with amplitude). In addition, particular attention is given to the resultant sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values partitioned according to patient category; i.e., patients with OSAHS may be divided into normal, mild, moderate and severe. Lastly, a simple RDI is computed based on the automated analyses; i.e., the number of apnoeic segments detected divided by the total number of segments used. A comparison between computed RDI and AHI values for the test database show correlation values above 0.8. In conclusion, this thesis shows that through the automated analysis of the SpO2 signal, OSAHS severity in patients suspected of having the disorder can be quantified. The AR-modelling with an incorporated amplitude criterion, in particular, shows the most promise for further work in this area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".