MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2477659238 · doi:10.1525/jsah.2010.69.1.121

Review: <i>Design and Plan in the Country House: From Castle Donjons to Palladian Boxes</i>, by Andor Gomme and Alison Maguire

2010· article· en· W2477659238 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey Tyack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconCitationPlan (archaeology)Library scienceDownloadPoliticsHistoryMedia studiesArt historySociologyPolitical scienceLawComputer scienceWorld Wide WebArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| March 01 2010 Review: Design and Plan in the Country House: From Castle Donjons to Palladian Boxes, by Andor Gomme and Alison Maguire Andor Gomme and Alison Maguire; Design and Plan in the Country House: From Castle Donjons to Palladian Boxes; New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2008, 338 pp., 288 illus., 230 plans. £50, ISBN 9780300126457 Geoffrey Tyack Geoffrey Tyack Kellogg College, Oxford Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2010) 69 (1): 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2010.69.1.121 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Geoffrey Tyack; Review: Design and Plan in the Country House: From Castle Donjons to Palladian Boxes, by Andor Gomme and Alison Maguire. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 March 2010; 69 (1): 121–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2010.69.1.121 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search For Le Corbusier (Towards a New Architecture, ed. F. Etchells, 1927) "the plan is the generator," and this belief lies behind Gomme and Maguire's long and idiosyncratic book. Plans do come before elevations, and anyone seriously wishing to understand domestic architecture should study plans before being seduced by the blandishments of style and ornament. The focus of their study is the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when the loose domestic planning of the Middle Ages gave way in Britain to a more compact system that reached its apogee in the forty years or so after the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. This is not a new field of inquiry. Domestic planning looms large in Mark Girouard's Life in the English Country House (1978) and his Robert Smythson and the Elizabethan Country House (1983), and more recently there have been Nicholas Cooper's perceptive and wide-ranging Houses of the Gentry... You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.040

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Society of Architectural HistoriansSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207