MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2477694274 · doi:10.15578/segara.v9i1.30

DINAMIKA TEMPORAL KANDUNGAN MERKURI TERLARUT, TERENDAPKAN DAN TERSUSPENSI DI PERAIRAN ESTUARI KAPUAS KECIL, KALIMANTAN BARAT

2013· article· id· W2477694274 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zainal Arifin, Mochamad Furqon Azis Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Segara · 2013
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsEnvironmental scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Secara fisik, logam berat merkuri dalam perairan terdapat dalam fase terlarut, tersuspensi dan terendapkan. Konsentrasi merkuri dalam tiga fase tersebut sangat dinamis dan sangat menentukan konsentrasi logam dalam biota. Penelitian ini telah dilakukan pada April-Mei 2011 (musim peralihan I) dan September-Oktober 2011 (musim peralihan II) di Perairan Estuari Kapuas Kecil. Pengambilan sampel air dan sedimen dilakukan sebanyak 26 stasiun, 3 stasiun di sungai dan 23 stasiun di estuari. Analisis merkuri terlarut, terendapkan dan tersuspensi menggunakan CVAAS (Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kandungan merkuri terlarut, terendapkan dan tersuspensi dipengaruhi oleh musim. Kandungan merkuri terlarut dan terendapkan di perairan Estuari Kapuas Kecil pada musim peralihan I lebih rendah dibandingkan musim peralihan II sedangkan konsentrasi merkuri tersuspensi lebih besar pada musim peralihan I dibandingkan musim peralihan II. Berdasarkan pada kriteria baku mutu laut nasional menurut Kemen LH No. 51 Tahun 2004 dan CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of The Environment), kandungan logam merkuri terlarut dan terendapkan di Perairan Estuari Kapuas Kecil umumnya relatif rendah dan masih dibawah ambang batas aman bagi kehidupan biota

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal SegaraSame topicHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationFrench-language works237,207