Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maintenant reconnues comme élément majeur du rayonnement culturel dans les municipalités, les bibliothèques publiques du Québec ne se limitent plus, en cette fin de vingtième siècle, à simplement prêter des livres. Dotées d’une mission sociale incontournable, elles offrent à leurs usagers des biens culturels multimédias, des services de haute technologie et une variété d’activités d’animation pouvant rejoindre tous les publics. Le présent article retrace les grandes étapes de l’ontogenèse de ce qui fut jadis un modeste comptoir de prêt. Une métamorphose ayant engendré, à certains endroits, des maisons de la culture, à d’autres, des médiathèques. Une reconversion qui rétablit le dynamisme d’une organisation professionnelle transformée grâce à un accord de partenariat entre les municipalités et l’État québécois. Le mode de fonctionnement de ces nouveaux temples du savoir de la société post-moderne y est décrit, notamment les aspects suivants : le financement, le cadre législatif, le traitement documentaire, le regroupement et les clientèles desservies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".