MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2478414568 · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75269-3_4

Postsynaptic Excitatory Transmission

2009· book-chapter· en· W2478414568 on OpenAlexaff
John F. MacDonald, Suhas A. Kotecha, Michael Jackson, Michael A. Beazely

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Pain · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcitatory postsynaptic potentialNeuroscienceSilent synapsePostsynaptic potentialIon channel linked receptorsGlutamatergicNeurotransmissionLong-term depressionPostsynaptic densityGlutamate receptorBiologySynaptic plasticityInhibitory postsynaptic potentialMetabotropic glutamate receptorChemistryReceptorAMPA receptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vast majority of excitatory synapses in the mammalian central nervous system employ glutamate as their transmitter. Glutamatergic transmission therefore generates most excitatory synaptic potentials (epsps); and, regulation of postsynaptic receptors for glutamate is a pivotal means of altering excitatory synaptic transmission to produce various forms of synaptic plasticity. Interactions between glutamate receptors in the same synapse, or in the extrasynaptic region of the neuron membrane are likely to alter their function and their surface expression in the plasma membrane. Glutamate receptors are also the target of modifications by the postsynaptic receptors of “long” transmitter systems (e.g., cholinergic and dopaminergic systems). We have shown that long-distance cross-talk between receptors for “long” transmitters and glutamate receptors occurs through the sharing of overlapping signal transduction pathways and may also make use of the signal relay mechanism of growth factor receptor “transactivation”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular PainSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207