The United States Is No Longer AAA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter reports that Standard & Poor's (S&P) had on August 5, 2011, cut the US long-term credit rating by a notch to AA-plus (from AAA). This unprecedented move reflected concerns about the US budget deficits and rising debt burden. It called the outlook negative, indicating that another downgrade is possible in the next 12 to 18 months. With the downgrade, the US no longer warrants the top-tier rating it has enjoyed since 1941. At AA+, the US is still considered to have a strong ability to service its debt. Only Canada, Germany, France, and the UK still carry triple-A at S&P. The downgrade did not affect US short-term rating, which remains at A-1+, the highest at S&P. In a follow through, S&P downgraded numerous government-related enterprises, 73 investment funds, and ten insurance companies for their large holdings of treasuries. Market sentiment aside, the purchases did little to change the fundamental backdrop in Europe, where economic growth has slowed even in the “core” nations of Germany and France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.348 | 0.308 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".