Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solly Angel passed through Yokohama, Japan to address a regional conference on the role of government in housing. He wanted to talk to his engineer friend, Jens Overgaard, about what he discovered when he met with Harry Jones. He told him that he had recently realized that the thin-scale problem boiled down to answering three questions: the plate question, the load cell question, and the electronics question. He also explained that the quarter-inch plates that they tried in New England were either too heavy or, if not too heavy, too weak to resist deflection under load. He then asked Overgaard the plate question and he simply replied, “a sandwich structure” and then proceeded to explain what he meant. This structure is uniquely suited to the construction of lightweight panels that are subjected to bending loads. Some parts for a new prototype were made, putting the sandwich plate idea into practice for the first time, but some of the high-tech materials needed were not readily available, so the new prototype would have to wait for the return to New York.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it