MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2479184841 · doi:10.21273/hortsci.36.2.236

Trailing Blackberries: From Clear-cuts to Your Table

2001· article· en· W2479184841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chad E. Finn

Bibliographic record

VenueHortScience · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBerry genetics and cultivation research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsRubusCultivarEvergreenCropAgricultureGeographyAgricultural scienceTable (database)AgroforestryAgricultural economicsBiologyHorticultureForestryArchaeologyBotanyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The commercial blackberry (Rubus sp.) industry in the United States and Canada can be roughly divided into eastern North America, Oregon, and California components. In the eastern United States, the plantings tend to be fairly small (mostly <0.25 ha, but up to 8 ha), geared towards pick-your-own or local sales, with either semierect (e.g., 'Chester Thornless') or erect (e.g., 'Navaho') cultivars In Oregon, there are 2500 ha in production (National Agricultural Statistics Service-Oregon Agricultural Statistics Service, 1999), the crop is primarily machine-harvested for the processing market, and the cultivars are trailing types (e.g., 'Marion' and 'Thornless Evergreen'). The California blackberry industry, while still relatively small, is expanding, using publicly and privately developed trailing, erect, and semierect cultivars that are hand-harvested for wholesale, fresh-market sales. Breeding programs in Florida and Texas have developed blackberry cultivars from indigenous species, but have not accounted for a significant acreage in North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHortScienceSame topicBerry genetics and cultivation researchFrench-language works237,207