MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2479247956

3D AUDITORY-ARTICULATORY MODELING OF THE LARYNGEAL CONSTRICTOR MECHANISM

2007· article· en· W2479247956 on OpenAlex
Scott R. Moisik, John H. Esling

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonationVocal tractArticulatorEpiglottisLarynxContext (archaeology)GlottisAcousticsMathematicsAnatomyAudiologySpeech recognitionComputer scienceMedicineGeologyPhysicsOrthodontics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vocal tract is reinterpreted in the context of the laryngeal articulator model, which integrates the functions of the laryngeal and oral components of the vocal tract. To account for the action of pharyngeal-resonator reduction, for constricted phonation types, and for the interaction of glottal pitch with the laryngeal constrictor mechanism, a three-dimensional model has been developed on the basis of auditory parameters and extrapolation from articulatory data sources. A critical aspect of the proposed model is the functioning of the aryepiglottic sphincter, formed by the aryepiglottic folds at the upper border of the larynx articulating towards the epiglottis, in such sounds as [÷, ?, I, ?, ©]. The novel feature of this model is the inclusion of a separate and ‘reversed’ action of the laryngeal component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207