MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2479369975 · doi:10.5749/9780816678525-005

3. Making Citizens In Magnaville

2010· book-chapter· en· W2479369975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geoffrey Whitehall, Cedric Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Minnesota Press eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Economic history of UK and US
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)CitizenshipAgency (philosophy)RefugeeSettlement (finance)Political scienceCapital (architecture)Corporate governancePolitical economySovereigntyPublic administrationVulnerability (computing)RationalityImmigrationSociologyCivil societyLawPoliticsSocial scienceGeographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter examines the unique terms of neoliberal sovereignty where private institutions and market rationality increasingly create the conditions for meaningful citizenship, mobility, material comfort, and security for some while excluding others. It begins by revisiting media debates over usage of the term "refugee" to describe disaster victims, suggesting that such debates revealed the inadequacy of civil rights discourse for addressing new states of vulnerability and exclusion under neoliberalism. It then looks at the "Magnaville," a transitional residential settlement created by Canadian industrialist Frank Stronach as an effort to promote neoliberal self-governance in New Orleans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Although this charitable project addressed the immediate needs of some evacuees, its most enduring accomplishment was to advance a privatized approach to relief and reconstruction and demonstrate how philanthropy and individual agency can resolve the deep inequalities produced by global capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Minnesota Press eBooksSame topicPolitical and Economic history of UK and USFrench-language works237,207