Bibliographic record
Abstract
The New York Times recently reported that religion, in the last twenty years in particular, has edged its way into the forefront of American life. More specifically, there are currently 70 million evangelical Christians now living in the United States, making it the most popular religious subgroup in the entire Western world. Of all Americans, Fifty three per cent cite religion as key to how they vote (and how they did vote most recently in November 2004) — the highest the religion factor has ever been in American voting history. It is therefore now considered ‘a normal thing’ to discuss religion within American society (Goodstein, 2004, p. 2). Paglia (1992) discusses the power and significance of American-style evangelical1 Christianity in her essay, ‘The joy of Presbyterian sex’, saying there are ‘Protestant looks, Protestant manners, Protestant values’ central in American society. Because of Canada’s proximity to the US and because of the vast influence America currently wields in Canada, an exploration of evangelical Christianity as part of understanding gender public performances is brought forward here.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".