Richard Day, <i>A Book of Christian Prayers</i> (1608)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
About the author Richard Day (1552–1606), London printer, assisted his father, John Day, in producing works of reformed religious interest, most notably the third edition of Foxe's Acts and Monuments (V.2). He became co-patent holder of his father's stock (including the enormously influential Psalms in Metre and The ABC with the Little Catechism ). About the text Responding to the demand for new books of devotion for daily and domestic use occasioned by the reintroduction of the Book of Common Prayer, John Day printed Christian Prayers and Meditations in 1569, the first of many editions. Although the prayers are consistent with the reformed practices, the visual layout makes the work something of a Protestant ‘Book of Hours’. Instead of an illustration of the Virgin Mary opening the work (as with earlier Catholic Horae ), Queen Elizabeth is shown at her private devotion. This, coupled with her having owned a copy (now in the Lambeth Palace Library), gave rise to calling it ‘Queen Elizabeth's Prayer Book’. Although there is some variation in the incidental decorative ornaments, every edition from 1578 to 1608 retains the same distinctive border illustrations. Seven sequences constitute the overarching iconographic programme: the life of Christ; personifications of twenty-two Christian virtues; vignettes of the six acts of corporal mercy (Matt. 25); allegories of the senses with biblical mottoes; the Apocalypse; the Dance of Death; and, finally, the ‘four last things’ of Christian eschatology – death, judgement, hell and heaven. The arts of memory The pictorial elements use many aspects of the traditional art of memory, especially as the images are arranged in designated sequences that establish a continuous visual narrative, in effect furnishing a mnemonic itinerary. As the pictures have no direct or intended correspondence to the prayers on the page, the visual programme creates a book within the book that serves as a devotional guide in its own right. The work draws on the medieval Book of Hours and Biblia pauperum (though neither a bible nor for the poor; in fact, some extant copies are so lavishly coloured as to be considered de luxe artefacts). The latter was a picture book pairing Old and New Testament scenes to show how past events divinely foreshadowed future ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".