MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2480251564 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-3587

Abstract 3587: Multiplexed nuclear area and micronucleus screening identifies SKP1 as a human chromosome instability gene

2016· article· en· W2480251564 on OpenAlexaff
Laura L. Thompson, Allison K. Baergen, Zelda Lichtensztejn, Kirk J. McManus

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsResearch Institute in Oncology and HematologyUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChromosome instabilityGene silencingGeneTelomereGeneticsCandidate geneGenome instabilityMolecular biologyCancer researchChromosomeDNA damageDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chromosome instability (CIN) is defined as an increase in the rate at which whole chromosomes or large chromosomal fragments are gained or lost. It is hallmark of cancer that occurs frequently in both solid and liquid tumors. In addition, CIN is associated with highly aggressive tumors, the acquisition of multi-drug resistance, tumor recurrence and poor patient prognosis. Despite this, the majority of human CIN genes have yet to be elucidated, highlighting the need for studies aimed at identifying the defective genes that underlie CIN. In this study we utilized two complementary, image-based approaches capable of detecting CIN-associated phenotypes following RNAi-based silencing of candidate CIN genes. The first assay involves quantifying nuclear areas following silencing, where changes in mean nuclear area relative to controls act as a surrogate marker of CIN. The second approach monitors micronucleus (MN) formation where increases in the number of micronuclei are indicative of DNA damage or the mitotic defects that underlie CIN. These assays were employed in a high-content screen of 164 human candidate CIN genes in two unrelated cell lines, HT1080 and hTERT. In HT1080, the nuclear area and MN enumeration assays identified 88 and 96 putative CIN genes, respectively. In hTERT, the nuclear area and MN assays identified 112 and 19 putative CIN genes, respectively. Promising putative CIN genes such as SKP1 were identified and prioritized for subsequent validation based on the number of assays that identified the gene, and the strength of the CIN phenotype. Preliminary data collected through Western blotting, mitotic chromosome spreads and flow cytometry, provides evidence to support the validation of SKP1 as a bona fide human CIN gene. Identification and characterization of human CIN genes will provide critical insights into CIN and tumorigenesis, as well as identify potential targets that could be exploited in novel, precision medicine approaches for superior cancer treatment. Citation Format: Laura Thompson, Allison Baergen, Zelda Lichtensztejn, Kirk McManus. Multiplexed nuclear area and micronucleus screening identifies SKP1 as a human chromosome instability gene. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3587.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicRNA modifications and cancer→French-language works237,207→