MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480550743 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091722.053

John Foxe, <i>Acts and Monuments</i> (1563)

2016· book-chapter· en· W2480550743 on OpenAlexaff
William E. Engel, Rory Loughnane, Grant Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReignDocumentationHistoryPosition (finance)ArtArchaeologyGenealogyAncient historyPolitical scienceLawComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About the author John Foxe (1516/17–87) left his position at Oxford University because of his Reformed views, and subsequently followed many Protestants into exile during the Marian reign. On the continent, he toiled in the book trade, establishing a community of collaborators, who supplied him with much of the documentation for Acts and Monuments . About the text Popularly known as the Book of Martyrs , this lavishly illustrated text was one of the costliest English books to produce or to purchase in the sixteenth century, amounting to 1,800 folio pages in the first edition of 1563. The excerpt below comes from this edition's prefatory matter. Foxe along with the publisher John Day oversaw the printing of the first four editions, each successive edition of which revised and expanded upon the bulk of its predecessor. Foxe is less a conventional author than a compiler, editor and contributor to the massive tome that gathers from various sources the documentary accounts and records of bloody Mary's persecution of England's Protestants. Foxe models his project after that of Eusebius, a fourth-century Bishop of Caesarea, whose Ecclesiastical History , translated into English in 1577, chronicled the Church's growth from its inception to his own time. Foxe's book, second only to the Bible in its importance to English Protestant households, had an institutional presence, for chained copies were installed throughout England in cathedrals, churches, schools, libraries and guildhalls. The arts of memory The Book of Martyrs rather spectacularly marks the point at which the textually oriented memorialising of English Protestantism sublates the commemorative function of the saint's life: it both preserves and surmounts Catholic memory, whose devotion towards the miraculous body manifests itself in reliquaries, relics, icons and other venerable objects. Foxe wages a campaign against hagiography, exemplified by the cultural prominence of the Golden Legend , the florilegium of saints’ lives quarried by medieval preachers and widely circulated over the centuries in manuscript and print forms. This storehouse of saint lore captured the popular imagination, not only infusing life into the Church Calendar of Christian feasts but also supplying evocative imagery and scenes for the graphic arts. In Foxe's text, the martyr is not reducible to his body's grisly expiration, but bears witness to the Christian faith through word and deed, remaining true to his doctrinal beliefs in an assured and equanimous manner while suffering under extraordinary duress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207