MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480602128 · doi:10.2118/141302-pa

Use of Biodiesel as an Additive in Thermal Recovery of Heavy Oil and Bitumen

2010· article· en· W2480602128 on OpenAlexafffund
Tayfun Babadagli, Vahapcan Er, Khosrow Naderi, Zvonko Burkus, B. Özüm

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantAsphaltChemistrySurface tensionSteam injectionPulp and paper industryBiodieselChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryOil sandsChromatographyWaste managementMaterials scienceComposite materialBiochemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Bitumen extraction in oil sands-ore water slurry systems was studied by using lipids and lipid derivatives such as biodiesel (BD) as surfactant additive to promote bitumen recovery efficiency. Performance of BDs (i.e., canola and tall oil, a by-product of pulp mills using the bleached Kraft process) fatty acids methyl ester and food-grade fatty acids monoglycerides were evaluated as surfactant additives. Experimental findings suggest that BDs such as fatty acids methyl esters could also be used as surfactant additives to increase the efficiency of bitumen recovery in thermal in-situ processes such as steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) and cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) processes. The required dosage for the surfactant additive is about 0.1% of bitumen by mass. Also, interfacial tension measurements between bitumen and process water (YB,W) and BD and process water (YBD,W) support the surfactant behavior of BD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologySame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207