MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480704388 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091722.059

John Donne, ‘Sermon, preached at Lincoln's Inn’ (1649)

2016· book-chapter· en· W2480704388 on OpenAlexaff
William E. Engel, Rory Loughnane, Grant Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSermonParliamentPoetryArtMetaphysicsTheologyLawClassicsHistoryPhilosophyLiteraturePolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

About the author John Donne (1572–1631) was a poet and Church of England clergyman. He was born in London, educated at Hart Hall, Oxford (now Hertford College) and received legal training at Lincoln's Inn. Donne found work as a soldier, a secretary, a professional author (seeking patronage) and Member of Parliament, before finally accepting a role in the Church of England, rising to the eminent position of Dean of St Paul's. Although best known now for his dazzlingly inventive ‘metaphysical’ poems, with their extended metaphors and elaborate conceits, in his own day Donne was a celebrated preacher. About the text This excerpt derives from Donne's second sermon discussing Psalm 38, in which a penitent David chastises himself for his sins and asks for God's support (‘be not far from me’), for his ‘iniquities’ are ‘too heavy’ a burden for him. The sermon was included in a collection of fifty of Donne's sermons, first printed in 1649, eighteen years after Donne's death. It is not known when the sermon was first preached, but it almost certainly dates from the late 1610s or early 1620s when Donne was employed as preacher by the Lincoln's Inn Society. Potter and Simpson date the series of sermons about Psalm 38 to the spring or summer of 1618, based on a reference to the construction of a new chapel at Lincoln's Inn in the sermon on verse 9 (‘Introduction’, pp. 13–14). Donne's congregation for sermons at the Inns of Court would have largely consisted of members of the Inn, including ‘the benchers (the governing body of the Society), the barristers, and also the students’ (Rhatigan, p. 109). The arts of memory Donne often makes recourse to the art of memory in his sermons. For example, in a sermon on Psalm 90:14, preached at St Paul's, Donne compares the distinct words of that verse (and, thus, the order of the sermon) to ‘land-marks that must guide you [i.e. the listener] in this voyage and the places to which you must resort to assist your memory be pleased to take another survey and impression of them’ (Zzz2 v ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207