MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2480924310

Færgefart som Forretning. A/S Lillebelts-Overfarten 1920-1972

2016· article· no· W2480924310 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Dorthe Holm, Bo Poulsen

Bibliographic record

VenueVBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageno
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Law and Migration
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I denne artikel analyseres selskabet A/S Lillebelts-Overfarten som forretning. A/S Lillebelts-Overfarten stod for driften af færgeoverfarten mellem Assens på Vestfyn og Aarøsund på Haderslev Næs. I kølvandet på Genforeningen blev selskabet dannet i Assens i 1920, hvor købmænd og borgere tog initiativ til at genetablere den færgerute, der ellers havde været sløjfet siden tabet af Sønderjylland i 1864. De første 10 år var præget af gode tider. Særligt fragt af sukkerroer fra Sønderjylland til sukkerfabrikken i Assens, samt postbesørgelse mellem Fyn og Jylland var indbringende i starten. Perioden fra ca. 1930 til 1946 var præget af først den verdensomspændende økonomiske krise, mens krigsårene derefter bød på minesprængning af færgen og hårde isvintre. Herefter voksede selskabets omsætning støt, og ledelsen kunne glæde sig over et fornuftigt overskud, men den forøgede biltrafik i 1950’erne førte til kapacitetsproblemer om sommeren. Indkøbet af en større færge i 1963 løste kapacitetsproblemet, men må siges at have været en alt for kostbar investering. Særligt de øgede personaleudgifter blev en svøbe, og efter knap 10 år med støt stigende udgifter og et accelererende underskud lukkede selskabet i 1972. Det er ikke siden lykkedes at genetablere en færgeoverfart mellem Assens og Aarøsund.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2090.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)Same topicEuropean Law and MigrationFrench-language works237,207