Analysis and design of coupling capacitors for contactless capacitive power transfer systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper is focused on the analysis and design of the capacitive plates of the capacitive wireless power transfer system. The coupling structure resembles a loosely coupled capacitor. The electric field coupling interface is the most vital part of the wireless technology. The coupling interface determines the capacitance of the coupling capacitors, maximum power transfer, frequency and overall efficiency of the system. The paper is dedicated to understand the behaviour of the system with respect to the structural construction, frequency of operation and factors that affect the power transfer of the system. The various arrangements and configurations of the capacitive power transfer (CPT) are discussed. The important factors affects the value of coupling capacitance are discussed. Based on results obtained from the analysis, a design guide line is laid out for the construction of the coupling capacitors. The design guidelines addresses critical issues such as operational voltage, temperature stability and selection of the dielectric material. The construction of the system is simple, rugged and inexpensive, which makes it a great contender among the other wireless technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it