Analyse des enjeux relatifs au vivant dans les programmes scolaires français et québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte des adaptations apportées aux programmes qui répondent notamment aux avancées technoscientifiques qui modifient nos représentations et nos rapports au vivant, nous avons étudié les programmes scientifiques de la France et du Québec sous trois volets : la caractérisation du vivant, les approches éthiques du vivant et, enfin, les méthodologies scientifiques et techniques pour aborder le vivant. Nous observons dans les deux cas une similitude des connaissances scientifiques envisagées avec une prise en compte de la « mondialisation » et des préoccupations touchant l’avenir de la planète. De façon plus particulière, nous remarquons des nuances dans les progressions, dans certaines attentes en termes de construction de rapport au vivant, dans l’intégration d’un questionnement éthique et des variantes sur les méthodes proposées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".