MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W248157979

Digital Mapping, Charting, and Geodesy Analysis Program (DMAP) Technical Review of Proposed Ice Objects for AML

2001· article· en· W248157979 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hillary C. Mesick, Susan V. Carter, John Breckenridge

Bibliographic record

VenueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceScope (computer science)HydrographyGeologyOceanographyEngineeringMeteorologyGeographyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The United Kingdom Hydrographic Office requested a review of proposals received for incorporating ice objects into the Additional Military Layers (AML) product. Two proposals were made by the Canadian Ice Service: (1) No amendments arc necessary to ice objects in Maritime Foundation and Facilities (MFF) product specification, and (2) High Resolution Environment (HRE) (or Environment, Seabed, and Beach (ESB)) is revised to bring it into line with the ECDIS Ice Objects Version 3.0, but without extending the scope of HRE. It is noted that MFF and HRE (or ESB) both contain Sea Ice-Ice Area and Land Ice-Ice Area. Separate consideration will be given to removing all ice from MFF to ensure that there is no duplication of data (or to confirming that there are different specifications for different purposes).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207