MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2481603598 · doi:10.1520/mnl69-eb

Fuels Specifications: What They Are, Why We Have Them, and How They Are Used

2016· book· en· W2481603598 on OpenAlexaff
Salvatore J. Rand, Allen W. Verstuyft

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat transfer and supercritical fluids
Canadian institutionsAlchemy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)Key (lock)EngineeringComplement (music)Petroleum productPetroleumGasolineWaste managementForensic engineeringComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Description This new manual outlines reasons for fuel characteristics and the requirements of each specification. This is a complement product to our best-selling Manual 1, Significance of Tests for Petroleum Products. Written by our expert fuels instructors, this manual is an excellent resource for Individual chapters are available for separate purchases. Save 60% on the full price of key standards referenced in Manual 69. See related compilations ASTM Standards Related to Fuel Specifications, ASTM Standards on Gasoline and ASTM Standards on Aviation Fuels for details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.377
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat transfer and supercritical fluidsFrench-language works237,207