No estar del todo: los límites de la lucidez en la narrativa cortazariana
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo es la continuación necesaria de una indagación previa sobre la temática de la (in)autenticidad en la narrativa de Julio Cortázar. «A todo o nada: el problema de la (in)autenticidad en Rayuela» (Autor, en prensa) propuso una exégesis de la búsqueda personal de Horacio Oliveira en el marco de la filosofía ontológico-existencial de Martin Heidegger. El presente artículo propone ampliar dicha interpretación mediante una comparación sistemática con sus más notables predecesores: Johhny Carter y Persio. La especulación subyacente a nuestra investigación es que las búsquedas fallidas, «a todo o nada», de los perseguidores cortazarianos ocurren al interior de un mismo paradigma lúcido, que es la sistematización de un tipo de epistemología reduccionista. El fracaso individual de los protagonistas –que pese a su diversidad metodológica no logran trascender el subjetivismo radical y el individualismo metodológico propiciados por la modernidad, desembocando invariablemente en un solipsismo nihilista– es un componente necesario en un proceso de apertura existencial que comienza en El perseguidor, continúa en Los premios y finaliza en Rayuela.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".