MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2481926320

Optical Ethernet is Evolving as a Delivery Vehicle for Retail Metro Services

2006· article· en· W2481926320 on OpenAlexaff
Paul A. Kloppenburg, Barry J. Davies

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Fiber Communication Conference · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarrier EthernetMetro EthernetEthernet over PDHConnection-oriented EthernetTelecommunicationsEthernetATA over EthernetComputer networkService providerComputer scienceBusinessService (business)Ethernet flow controlMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical Ethernet (OE) services' only recently success in the marketplace, demonstrated by increasing enterprise demand and by the introduction of Ethernet services by major carriers world-wide, indicates that Optical Ethernet services are moving towards wider scale deployment. After migrating from the local area network (LAN) into the metro for private networks and campus solutions, Optical Ethernet is evolving as a delivery vehicle for retail metro services.Figure 1 illustrates the progress of metro Optical Ethernet since its introduction. Initially, as shown in the left of the figure, large enterprises began to adopt Ethernet for their campus and MAN private builds as they began to see the values of OE. This activity drove the adoption of OE by System Integrators, who developed managed private build offerings for large and medium enterprises, as illustrated by Figure 1. This in turn piqued the interest of service providers, who began offering OE connectivity over dedicated infrastructure. Today, initial OE offerings are migrating towards wider scale Optical Ethernet service deployments, and service providers are working to bridge the chasm and successfully deliver broad scale OE services.Today, two key trends are propelling Optical Ethernet services into mainstream deployment. First, diverse and sophisticated service level agreement (SLA)-based services are being defined and delivered by service providers. Second, service providers are understanding and overcoming some key challenges in evolving Optical Ethernet networks to support these services. This paper introduces Optical Ethernet services as they are being delivered today, and discusses how these are offered over different types of network architecture. This is followed by a review of some key challenges seen in each type of architecture, and specific observations on how service providers are overcoming these challenges today, bringing Optical Ethernet services closer to mainstream deployment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Fiber Communication ConferenceSame topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207