MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2482511638 · doi:10.1051/geotech/2003105015

Y a-t-il un effet de taille et d’encastrement pour les fondations superficielles dans les sables ?

2003· article· fr· W2482511638 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jean Louis Briaud

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Française de Géotechnique · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConnaught FundFoundation for Anesthesia Education and Research
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’effet de la taille d’une fondation superficielle et l’effet de son encastrement sur la courbe donnant le déplacement en fonction de la charge sont l’objet de cet article. Des arguments théoriques et surtout des données expérimentales sont présentés. Ils indiquent la chose suivante. Si le comportement de la fondation est représenté par la courbe donnant la pression sous la fondation divisée par une mesure de la résistance du sol dans la zone influencée par la fondation en fonction du tassement divisé par la largeur de la fondation, toutes les courbes ainsi obtenues pour des fondations de taille et d’encastrement différents se regroupent dans une bande serrée pour un sable donné. L’existence de cette bande serrée est en accord avec la méthode de la courbe charge-tassement proposée par Briaud et Jeanjean (1994).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Française de GéotechniqueSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207