MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2482841858 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2016-3661

Abstract 3661: ALDH1A3-inducible RARRES1 is a tumor suppressor in triple-negative breast cancer and is methylated in claudin-low breast cancers

2016· article· en· W2482841858 on OpenAlexaff
Krysta M. Coyle, Patrick J. Murphy, Dejan Vidovic, Cheryl A. Dean, Margaret L. Thomas, Derek R. Clements, Mohammad Sultan, Ahmad Vaghar-Kashani, Carman A. Giacomantonio, Lucy Helyer, Ian C.G. Weaver, Shashi Gujar, Patrick WK Lee, Paola Marcato

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerCancer researchTriple-negative breast cancerCancerBiologyCarcinogenesisGene knockdownPathologyMedicineInternal medicineCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The retinoic acid (RA) signalling pathway plays an important role in breast cancer progression and has either a pro-tumorigenic or tumor-suppressive role depending upon the effector function of RA-inducible genes that are expressed or epigenetically silenced. To study this paradigm in breast cancer, we focused on a controversial RA-inducible gene, the retinoic acid receptor responder 1 (RARRES1) protein that is often hypermethylated in cancer and has been reported to have tumor-suppressive function in prostate and nasopharyngeal carcinomas. However, in a study focused on a rare subtype of breast cancer, inflammatory breast cancer, RARRES1 is pro-tumorigenic. This functional discrepancy requires further investigation to determine its role in breast cancer in general. First, analysis of patient data sets revealed that RARRES1 is predominantly expressed in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). Knockdown of RARRES1 in claudin-low MDA-MB-231 and basal-like MDA-MB-468 and HCC1937 significantly increased tumor growth and cell proliferation, suggesting RARRES1 has a tumor suppressive function in (TNBC), regardless of position on the differentiation hierarchy. Expression analyses of 24 breast cancer cell lines (including 18 TNBC and 2 normal-like cell lines) revealed that RARRES1 is predominantly expressed in basal-like TNBC cells We found that RARRES1 expression is dependent on, and strongly correlates with, the cancer stem cell marker, and RA-producing, ALDH1A3 in fixed breast cancer patient samples. Immunohistochemistry of the same patient tumor samples revealed RARRES1 expression is localized to the endoplasmic reticulum. Importantly, however, the presence of ALDH1A3 or RA is not sufficient to induce RARRES1 expression. RARRES1 is hypermethylated in claudin-low breast cancer cell lines, and release of this silencing is required for full induction of RARRES1 expression. We have identified sites of regulation by methylation in RARRES1 using Illumina 450K methylation arrays and 5-methylcytosine ChIP. We conclude that RARRES1 is an ALDH1A3/RA-inducible tumor suppressor in TNBC with methylation and expression profiles distinct to the differentiation hierarchy observed in breast cancer. Citation Format: Krysta M. Coyle, Patrick Murphy, Dejan Vidovic, Cheryl A. Dean, Margaret L. Thomas, Derek Clements, Mohammad Sultan, Ahmad Vaghar-Kashani, Carman Giacomantonio, Lucy Helyer, Ian Weaver, Shashi Gujar, Patrick WK Lee, Paola Marcato. ALDH1A3-inducible RARRES1 is a tumor suppressor in triple-negative breast cancer and is methylated in claudin-low breast cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3661.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesFrench-language works237,207