Elimination trial on some of important conifers in Asalem forests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to investigate on the adaptation and performance of exotic trees in northern of Iran, a field experiment was carried out during 1991 to 2006 in Asalem forests. Nine species of different conifers, consisting of Pinus nigra var. austriaca, P. nigra var. pallasiana, P. nigra var. calabrica, Picea abies (prov. Klardasht), P. abies (prov. France), P. glauca (prov. Canada), P. orientalis (prov. Turkey), Pseudotsuga menziesii (prov. America) and P. menziesii (prov. California) were planted using a Random Complete Block design. At the end of each growth period, three parameters of survival, diameter and height were measured and results analyzed finally at the end of 16 years. The results showed that there was a significant difference of growth factors (diameter and height) among species (treatments) at significant level of 1%, whereas no significant difference was found in survival rate. Pseudotsuga menziesii (prov. California)showed the highest height (10.2 m) and Pinus nigra var. calabrica the highest diameter (16.1 cm) after 16 years of study period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".