Amending and Changing the Seismic Behavior of K-bracing by Yielding Damped Braced Frame (YDBF)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An inactive control method is to prepare the kinds of dampers as inactive energy wasting factor for metallic structure buildings. Yielding metallic dampers (or excurrent) are metallic devices which can waste energy in an earthquake by the effect of non-elastic changes of metals, also in the braced systems of structure buildings, they can improve resistance against earthquake and their damages control potential significantly. With regard to the geometry of K-bracing and the weaknesses which are by the effect of a resultant of two compressive and tensile forces of Bersnon, Iran's earthquake regulation in 2008 has exerted some limitations for using of this system. Therefore, in this research we tried to eliminate these limitations to some extent by using of metallic dampers. For doing this research, by using of two software of finite components (sap2000, Abaqus) with static non-linear analysis, we achieved the same purpose. This kind of dampers due to the simplicity of their installation and low cost of them can be applied both in new and existing buildings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".