Abstract 4526: Proscillaridin A effects on chromatin modifications and oncogene degradation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents approximately 25% of all pediatric cancers diagnosed every year. In about 80% of cases, pediatric patients will attain an event-free 5-year survival. Unfortunately, patients who are resistant to treatment or who relapse have a poor prognosis. Hence, novel therapeutic approaches are necessary to increase survival rates. Epigenetic alterations, such as DNA methylation and histone modifications, are involved in disease development, progression, and in particular, resistance to treatment. These reversible alterations represent additional targets in ALL. Recently, we discovered candidate epigenetic drugs in FDA-approved drug libraries. We hypothesize that one drug in particular, the cardiac glycoside proscillaridin A, has both epigenetic and anti-cancerous properties in preclinical models of ALL and can therefore be repositioned for the treatment of the disease. To test our hypothesis, we treated two ALL cell lines Nalm-6 (pre-B ALL) and Molt-4 (T-ALL) in vitro with clinically relevant concentrations of proscillaridin A and analyzed cell growth, cell cycle, gene expression and chromatin modifications. We observed dose-dependent growth inhibition in all cell lines, with IC50 values of 3.0 and 2.3 nM in Nalm-6 and Molt-4, respectively. Our results using BrdU staining indicate a block in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. By western blot, we detected a reduction in histone acetylation levels and in histone modifying enzymes CBP and Tip60, as well as the c-myc oncogene. These promising results illustrate the perspective of using the cardiac glycoside proscillaridin A as a novel epigenetic drug for the treatment of relapsed or refractory ALL. Citation Format: Gregory Armaos, Simon Jacques-Ricard, Elodie Da Costa, Annie Beaudry, Noël J-M Raynal. Proscillaridin A effects on chromatin modifications and oncogene degradation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4526.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".