MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483103534 · doi:10.5957/mt1.2000.37.3.146

Dynamic Instability of a High-Speed Planing Boat Model

2000· article· en· W2483103534 on OpenAlex
Eric Thornhill, Brian Veitch, Neil Bose

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Technology and SNAME News · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHullTowingBallastMarine engineeringPropulsionEngineeringInstabilityRange (aeronautics)InletSeakeepingAerospace engineeringMechanicsMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of bare-hull resistance and self-propulsion tests were carried out on a 1/8 scale model of a 11.8 m long, waterjet-propelled planing hull in the clear water towing tank at the National Research Council of Canada's Institute for Marine Dynamics. The bare-hull resistance tests, performed with the waterjet inlets closed, spanned a range of eight model velocities and nine ballast conditions consisting of three displacements each with three positions of the longitudinal center of gravity. The hull was then fitted with two model waterjet thrusters and tested over the same speeds and ballast conditions. Dynamic instability, or porpoising, was seen during certain high-speed tests. A discussion of this behavior and its relation to published dynamic stability limits is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it