MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W248326425 · doi:10.17816/humeco17295

STATE OF COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN ABLE-BODIED MEN DRIVING MOTOR TRANSPORT

2013· article· en· W248326425 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. N. Prokopchuk, N. V. Skrebtsova, В. В. Попов

Bibliographic record

VenueEkologiya Cheloveka (Human Ecology) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionVerbal fluency testPsychologyAudiologyMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychiatryNeuropsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have assessed cognitive functions in 103 able-bodied men (66 men were drivers; 37 men were in the control group, their profession was not connected with vibration). In each group, healthy patients and patients with arterial hypertension (AH) were separated. The cognitive functions were studied with use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA-test). Cognitive disorders were found in 45.5 % of the drivers and in 29.7 % of the men from the control group. A correlation between the level of the MoCA-test index and the profession of the drivers has been found. Statistically significant between-group differences in the state of delayed memory, attention, orientation, verbal fluency of the drivers and the control group (with the significance level of p < 0.05) have been found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEkologiya Cheloveka (Human Ecology)Same topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207