MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483365273 · doi:10.1057/9780230353282_5

The Role of Governments in CSR

2011· book-chapter· en· W2483365273 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jan Boon

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilityProsperityTransparency (behavior)BureaucracyCorporate governanceGovernment (linguistics)BusinessGood governancePoliticsDutyEnforcementState (computer science)Public administrationPolitical sciencePublic relationsLawFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The term ‘government’ encompasses the state governance apparatus of a country: its political system, bureaucracies and institutions, as well as its sublevels. ‘Home government’ is the government of the country where a transnational company is registered and ‘host government’ is that of any other country where it is conducting operations. Citizens expect their government to promote peace, order, and good governance, thereby creating conditions for prosperity. They have a duty to protect their citizens against human rights abuses by third parties, including business (Ruggie, 2008). The nature of the relation between the state and its communities and corporations, the state’s vulnerability to international pressures, transparency and the availability of information, and the enforcement and accessibility of a legal framework are key factors affecting governments’ abilities to live up to these expectations and influence Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) development initiatives undertaken by the extractive industry. This chapter provides a categorization of possible government roles in CSR and illustrates the issues, using examples from a series of interviews with key stakeholders in Canada and Peru (Boon, 2009). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.017
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan UK eBooksSame topicGlobal trade, sustainability, and social impactFrench-language works237,207