MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483451357 · doi:10.14288/1.0053052

Metallogeny, geochronology and tectonic setting of the Gangdese belt, southern Tibet, China

2012· article· en· W2483451357 on OpenAlexaff
Reza Tafti

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetallogenyGeochronologyGeologyTectonicsChinaGeochemistrySeismologyPaleontologyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Gangdese belt in southern Tibet forms the eastern section of the Trans- Himalayan magmatic belt. Until recently, the timing of magmatism in the Gangdese belt was poorly known due to the limited number of geochronological studies. Results of this study provide new insights into both the tectonomagmatic and metallogenic evolution of the southern Tibet. Six major magmatic events (Triassic and older, Early-Middle Jurassic, Late Jurassic, middle Cretaceous, latest Cretaceous-Eocene, and Oligocene-Miocene) are recognized within the southern Gangdese belt, each reflecting a specific paleotectonic setting. Early-Middle Jurassic magmatism occurred in a continental marginal arc tectonic setting, with magmatism related to south-dipping subduction of the Paleo-Tethys beneath the Lhasa terrane. Late Jurassic magmas were derived from a mixed magma source in an extensional magmatic arc setting, possibly during rollback of the Paleo-Tethyan slab and opening of the Neo-Tethys to the south of the Lhasa terrane. Continental arc magmatism, dominated by widespread and voluminous plutonism (Gangdese) and volcanism (Linzizong), began in Early Cretaceous time due to the onset of the north-dipping subduction of Neo-Tethys oceanic slab under the southern edge of the Lhasa terrane. This phase of subduction ended after the middle Eocene collision of the Indian and Eurasia continental plates. An apparent increase in magmatic activity around 50 Ma is attributed to the possible Neo-Tethyan slab rollback and breakoff. Cretaceous-Eocene magmatism includes a hiatus of magmatic activity from 80 Ma to 68 Ma. Miocene magmatism is post-collisional with adakite-like compositions possibly generated from partial melting of an enriched lower crust due to delamination of the thickened lithospheric mantle and asthenospheric upwelling after the collision. At least three major metallogenic epochs (Early-Middle Jurassic, Cretaceous-Eocene and Miocene) within the belt have been recognized, including the world-class Jurassic Xietongmen Cu-Au and Miocene Qulong Cu-Mo porphyry deposits. The Early-Middle Jurassic event includes formation of two major porphyry Cu-Au deposits (Xietongmen and Newtongmen) in the Xietongmen district, reflecting a major but previously unrecognized metallogenic event. This has global economic importance because the rate of new discoveries of large deposits within better explored belts elsewhere in the world has decreased significantly in the last few decades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.150 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207