MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483456379 · doi:10.1201/b13008-6

Fault Diagnosis of Electric Machines Using Techniques Based on Frequency Domain

2012· book-chapter· en· W2483456379 on OpenAlexaff
Subhasis Nandi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault (geology)Frequency domainComputer scienceDomain (mathematical analysis)Reliability engineeringEngineeringGeologyMathematicsSeismologyComputer visionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of the fault detection techniques used in real time fault detection in power systems is time-domain based. The over current, over voltage, earth fault, impedance relays, and so forth are mostly time-domain based. The fault frequencies to be detected can be simply derived by replacing the fundamental frequency with Low-order harmonics in the equations describing these frequencies. Stator faults usually progress from incipient to a very advanced stage in a matter of seconds. Like stator faults, rotor faults also have been reported to be detectable using odd harmonics in the motor terminal voltage at motor switch-off. Eccentricity faults are related to deformation of air-gaps of an electric machine. Low-order harmonic components that appear in the line voltage of inverters supplying induction motors can provide additional information on the fault of induction machines. Voltage unbalance and machine asymmetries that also change the negative sequence current and impedance can cause misdiagnosis when faults involve only a few turns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207