MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483601402 · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-58215-7_11

The Dark Side of Realized Hope: Hybridity Traces the Roots of Christian Intolerance

2016· book-chapter· en· W2483601402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAugustinian Studies and Theology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityKing's University College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristianityEmperorShadow (psychology)SAINTHybridityRulerHistoryPhilosophyLiteratureReligious studiesArtAncient historyPsychologyArt historyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The so-called first Christian emperor, Constantine (often also called “the Great”),1 remains to this day an elusive and controversial figure in that there seems to be no consensus on whether his mark on Christianity was predominantly positive or negative: He continues to be revered as a saint and/or conscientious ruler by some, yet maligned as the corruptor of Christianity by others.2 Whatever opinion one may hold of him, Christians and, indeed, the whole Western world, still lie in his shadow because of the decisive influence that his policies and actions have had and continue to exert first on Christianity and then, also on the Western world at large. For this reason, I feel that there is always room for yet another study on a Constantinian topic that will hopefully shed a little more light on the various historical and, yes, also theological problems that Constantine and his legacy present to us.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it