MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483718775 · doi:10.1109/bmsb.2016.7521933

Performance evaluation of multiple-PLP based LDM systems for the next generation terrestrial broadcasting

2016· article· en· W2483718775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadcasting (networking)MultiplexingComputer scienceDivision (mathematics)Time-division multiplexingLayer (electronics)Physical layerVariety (cybernetics)Frequency-division multiplexingTelecommunicationsComputer networkOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingWirelessMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present performance evaluation of multiple physical layer pipe (PLP) based layered division multiplexing (LDM) systems for the next generation terrestrial broadcasting. In addition to a conventional multiple-PLP configuration, which is based on time division multiplexing (TDM), a variety of LDM configurations, which includes combinations of TDM and two-layer LDM, and three-layer LDM, are considered. Given three different broadcasting contents are delivered by three PLPs, performance comparison and analysis are provided when four different multiple-PLP configurations including TDM, two-layer LDM, and three-layer LDM are used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.111 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it