MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483782932 · doi:10.3917/ri.166.0069

Woodrow Wilson, Charles R. Crane et la Révolution de février 1917. Le rêve d’une diplomatie évangélique

2016· article· fr· W2483782932 on OpenAlexaff
Zacharie Leclair

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations internationales · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après la Révolution de février 1917, alors que les États-Unis viennent d’entrer en guerre avec l’objectif avoué de réformer les relations entre les peuples et que le front russe s’anéantit, il devient impératif pour les Américains de soutenir le gouvernement provisoire contre les forces réclamant un armistice. Inspiré par un de ses proches amis, un philanthrope du nom de Charles R. Crane, le président Woodrow Wilson envoie une délégation diplomatique chargée de convaincre les Russes de poursuivre la guerre. Or, parmi elle se trouvent plus que des diplomates. Des représentants des cercles missionnaires, incluant Crane, donnent à cette tournée un aspect méconnu qui révèle un des traits essentiels du wilsonisme : sa dimension chrétienne et humanitaire comme pierre d’assise d’un nouvel ordre mondial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations internationalesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207