MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2483947046 · doi:10.1039/c6en00144k

Emerging nanomaterials for the application of selenium removal for wastewater treatment

2016· article· en· W2483947046 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew B. Holmes, Frank Gu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science Nano · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of WaterlooNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsBioaccumulationSeleniumNanomaterialsEnvironmental chemistryWastewaterAdsorptionEnvironmental scienceChemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceEnvironmental engineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenium contaminated wastewater derived from global industrial activity can bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms, presenting a source of toxicity. Several classes of nanomaterials, such as nanoscale adsorbents, catalysts and reactants, have promising potential for removing selenium in to ultra-low ppb levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science NanoSame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207